Petrus Van Musschenbroek (1692-1761) en el ámbito de la physica y su lugar en la filosofía

Autores/as

  • Steffen Ducheyne Vrije Universiteit Brussel

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/asclepio.2016.02

Palabras clave:

Petrus van Musschenbroek (1692-1761), Filosofía natural versus física (experimental), Physica, Teleología, Leyes de la naturaleza, Voluntarismo, Principio de razón suficiente

Resumen


Como complemento al relato de John L. Heilbron, argumentaré que aunque la etiqueta ‘física experimental’ se puede usar legítimamente para describir algunos aspectos de la obra de Petrus van Musschenbroek (1692-1761), la comprensión de la ‘physica’ de este último se ha de entender dentro de un marco más amplio en el que las consideraciones teológicas, filosóficas, y teleológicas continuaron desempeñando una función importante. En primer lugar, me centraré en la concepción de van Musschenbroek en el ámbito de la ‘physica’ y en especial en su concepto de una ley de la naturaleza. Se verá que, al radicalizar algunos aspectos de las ideas metodológicas de Isaac Newton, van Musschenbroek ya no se considera la física como la disciplina que descubre las causas de efectos, como hizo Newton, sino como la disciplina que estudia los efectos de causas desconocidas. Además, se verá que van Musschenbroek pensaba que las leyes de la naturaleza están supeditadas a la libre voluntad de Dios y que son cognoscibles debido a la bondad de Dios. En segundo lugar, argumentaré que para van Musschenbroek la física, junto con la teleología, tenía claras repercusiones físico-teológicas. En el camino, por primera vez discutirá su posición en relación con el principio de razón suficiente.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Adam, Charles and Paul Tannery (eds.) (1897-1913), OEuvres de Descartes (12 vols.). Paris, Léopold Cerf.

Boscovich, P. Rogerius Josephus (1754), De continuitatis lege et ejus consectariis pertinentibus ad primam materiæ elementa eorumque vires dissertatio. Romæ: Apud Venatium Monaldini Bibliopolam in via cursus.

Bots, J. (1972), Tussen Descartes en Darwin, Geloof en natuurwetenschap in de achttiende eeuw in Nederland. Assen, Van Gorcum & Comp. N. V. PMid:5024897

Buchwald, Jed Z. and Hong, Sungook (2003), "Physics". In: Cahan, David (ed.), From Natural Philosophy to the Sciences: Writing the History of Nineteenth-century Science. University of Chicago Press, pp. 163-195.

van Bunge, Wiep (2001), From Stevin to Spinoza, An Essay on Philosophy in the Seventeenth-century Dutch Republic. Leiden/Boston/Köln, Brill.

Clarke, Samuel (ed.) (1717), A Collection of Papers, Which passed between the late learned Mr. Leibnitz, and Dr. Clarke, In the Years 1715 and 1716. London, James Knapton.

Condorcet O'Connor, A. and M. F. Arago (eds.) (1847), Oeuvres de Condorcet (12 vols.). Paris, Firmin Didot Frères.

Curley, E. M. (ed.) (1985), The Collected Writings of Spinoza, Volume I. Princeton University Press.

de Clercq, Pieter (1997a), At the Sign of the Orient Lamp, The Musschenbroek Workshop in Leiden, 1660-1750. Rotterdam, Erasmus Publishing.

de Clercq, Pieter (1997b), The Leiden Cabinet of Physics, A Descriptive Catalogue. Leiden, Boerhaave Museum Leiden.

de Pater, C. (1979), Petrus van Musschenbroek (1692-1761), Een newtoniaans natuuronderzoeker. Utrecht, Elinkwijk.

de Pater, C. (1990), "Nicolaus Engelhard (1696-1765) en zijn kritiek of de Beginselen der natuurkunde van Petrus van Musschenbroek (1692-1761): Wolffianisme versus Newtonianisme", Tijdschrift voor de geschiedenis der geneeskunde, natuurwetenschappen, wiskunde en techniek, 13 (2), pp. 141-161.

de Pater, Kees (2012), "'The Wisest Man to whom this Earth Has as Yet given Birth,' Petrus van Musschenbroek and the Limits of Newtonian Philosophy". In: Jorink, Eric and Ad Maas (eds.), Newton and the Netherlands, How Newton was fashioned in the Dutch Republic. Amsterdam: Leiden University Press, pp. 139-157.

Ducheyne, Steffen (2012), 'The main Business of Natural Philosophy:' Isaac Newton's Natural-philosophical Methodology. Dordrecht, Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2126-5

Ducheyne, Steffen (2014a), "W. J. 's Gravesande's Appropriation of Newton's Natural Philosophy, Part I: Epistemological and Theological issues", Centaurus, 56 (1), pp. 31-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1600-0498.12040

Ducheyne, Steffen (2014b), "W. J. 's Gravesande's Appropriation of Newton's Natural Philosophy, Part II: Methodological Issues", Centaurus, 56 (2), pp. 97-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1600-0498.12050

Ducheyne, Steffen (2014c), "'Celeberrimus Atheismi patronus præcedentis sæculi': Petrus van Musschenbroek's Anti-Spinozism unveiled", Lias, Journal of Early Modern Intellectual Culture and its Sources, 41 (2), pp. 173-197.

Ducheyne, Steffen (2014d), "Newton on Action at a Distance", Journal of the History of Philosophy, 52 (4), pp. 675-702. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hph.2014.0081

Ducheyne, Steffen (2015), "Petrus van Musschenbroek and Newton's 'vera stabilisque Philosophandi methodus'", Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte, 38 (4), pp. 279-304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bewi.201501745 PMid:26641412

Frängsmyr, Tore; John L. Heilbron and Robin E. Rider, (eds.) (1990), The Quantifying Spirit in the 18th Century. Berkeley, University of California Press.

's Gravesande, Willem Jacob (17423 [1720-1]), Physices elementa mathematica experimentis confirmata, sive introductio ad philosophiam Newtoniam (2 vols.). Leidae, Johannes Arnoldus Langerak, Johannes et Hermannus Verbeek.

's Gravesande, Willem Jacob (17476 [1720-1721]), Mathematical Elements of Natural Philosophy, Confirm'd by Experiments: Or, an Introduction to Sir Isaac Newton's Philosophy, trans. by J. T. Desaguliers (2 vol.). London, T. Longman e.a.

Guijarro Mora, Víctor (2001), "Petrus van Musschenbroek y la física experimental del siglo XVIII", Asclepio, 53 (2), pp. 191- 212. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/asclepio.2001.v53.i2.167

Gurr, John Edwin (1959), The Principle of Sufficient Reason in Some Scholastic Systems 1750-1900. Milwaukee, The Marquette University Press.

Hamm, E. (2012), "Improving Mennonites in an Age of Revolution", The Conrad Grebel Review, 30 (1), pp. 24-51.

Heilbron John L. (1980), "Experimental Natural Philosophy". In: Rousseau, G. S. and Roy Porter (eds.), The Ferment of Knowledge: Studies in the Historiography of Eighteenth-century Science. Cambridge University Press, pp. 357-387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511572982.010

Heilbron, John L. (1966), "A propos de l'invention de la bouteille de Leyde", Revue d'histoire des sciences et de leurs applications, 19 (2), pp. 133-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/rhs.1966.2485

Heilbron, John L. (1999 [1979]), Electricity in the 17th and 18th Centuries, A Study in Early Modern Physics. Dover, New York. Israel, Jonathan I. (1995), The Dutch Republic, Its Rise, Greatness, and Fall 1477-1806. Oxford, Clarendon Press.

Home, R. W. (2003), "Mechanics and Experimental Physics". In: Porter, Roy (ed.), The Cambridge History of Science, Volume 4: Eighteenth-century science. Cambridge University Press, pp. 354-374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/chol9780521572439.016

Israel, Jonathan I. (2001), Radical Enlightenment, Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650-1750. Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198206088.001.0001

Krop, Henri (2001), "Philosophia naturalis in the Dutch Republic: Physics and Philosophy during the Enlightenment", Geschiedenis van de wijsbegeerte in Nederland, 12, pp. 121- 132.

Lovejoy, Arthur O. (1964 [1936]), The Great Chain of Being, A Study of the History of an Idea. Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard University Press. PMid:14179126

Molhuysen, P. C. (1910-1924), Bronnen tot de geschiedenis der Leidsche Universiteit, 1574-1811 (7 vols.). 's-Gravenhage, Martinus Nijhoff.

van Musschenbroek Petrus (1723), Oratio de certa methodo philosophiæ experimentalis, Dicta publice A. D. xiii. Septemb. 1723. Trajecti ad Rhenum, Guilielmus Vande Water.

van Musschenbroek, Peter (1744), The Elements of Natural Philosophy, Chiefly intended for the Use of Students in Universities, trans. by John Colson (2 vols.). London, J. Nourse.

van Musschenbroek, Petrus (1715), Disputatio medica inauguralis de aëris praesentia in humoribus animalibus. Lugduni Batavorum, S. Luchtmans.

van Musschenbroek, Petrus (1726), Epitome elementorum physico-mathematicorum, conscripta in usus academicos. Lugduni Batavorum, Samuel Lugtmans.

van Musschenbroek, Petrus (1729), Physicæ experimentales, et geometricæ, de magnete, tuborum capillarium vitreorumque speculorum attractione, magitudine terræ, cohærentia corporum firmorum dissertationes: Ut et ephemerides meterologicæ ultrajectinæ. Lugduni Batavorum, Samuel Luchtmans.

van Musschenbroek, Petrus (1736), Beginselen der natuurkunde. Leiden, Samuel Luchtmans.

van Musschenbroek, Petrus (1739), Traité de physique, transl. by Pierre Massuet (2 vols.). Leyden, Samuel Luchtmans.

van Musschenbroek, Petrus (1741.), Elementa physicæ conscripta in usus academicos. Lugduni Batavorum, Samuel Luchtmans.

van Musschenbroek, Petrus (1744), Oratio de sapientia divina. Lugduni Batavorum, Samuel Luchtmans & Filius.

van Musschenbroek, Petrus (1748a), Institutiones physicæ conscriptæ in usus academicos. Lugduni Batavorum, Samuel Luchtmans et filius.

van Musschenbroek, Petrus (1748b), Institutiones logicæ, Præcipue comprehentes artem argumentandi. Lugduni Batavorum, Samuel Luchtmans et filius.

van Musschenbroek, Petrus (1756 [1731]), Tentamina experimentorum naturalium captorum in Academia del Cimento. Viennæ, Pragæ, et Tergesti, Joannis Thomas Trattner.

van Musschenbroek, Petrus (1762), Introductio ad philosophiam naturalem, ed. by Johannes Lulofs. Lugduni Batavorum, Sam. et Joh. Luchtmans.

Newton, Isaac (1952 [1730]), Opticks, or A treatise of the reflections, refractions, Inflections & colours of Light. Dover, New York.

Newton, Isaac (1999), The Principia, Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, A New Translation by I. Bernard Cohen and Anne Whitman, assisted by Julia Budenz. Berkeley, University of California Press.

Nollet, Jean-Antoine (1746), "Lettre de M. l'Abbé Nollet, de l'Académie des Sciences, au P. B. J. sur l'Electricité", Mémoires pour l'Histoire des Sciences et des beaux Arts, 46 (October), pp. 2074-2090.

Roosenboom, Maria (1970), "Petrus van Musschenbroek's 'Oratio de sapientia divina'", In: Smith, P. and R. J. Ch. V. ter Laage (eds.), Essays in Biohistory. Utrecht: International Association for Plant Taxonomy, pp. 177-194.

Ruestow, E. G. (1973), Physics at Seventeenth and Eighteenth-century Leiden: Philosophy and the New Science in the University. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2463-1

Schuurman, Paul (2004), Ideas, Mental Faculties and Method: The Logic of Ideas of Descartes and Locke and its Reception in the Dutch Republic. Leiden, Brill.

Struik, D. J. (1974), "Musschenbroek, Petrus van". In: Gillispie, Charles C. (ed.) (1970-1980), Dictionary of Scientific Biography. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, vol. IX, pp. 594-597.

Wolff Christian (1736. [1728]), Philosophia rationalis, sive, Ontologia methodo scientifica pertracta. Veronæ, S. Thomas.

Wolff, Cristian (1728), Philosophia rationalis sive logica, Methodo Scientifica pertracta et ad usum scientiarum atque vitæ aptata. Francofurti & Lipsiæ, Prostat in officina libraria Rengeriana.

Yitzhal Melamed (2010), "Principle of Sufficient Reason", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2012 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta, [online], accessible on: http:// plato.stanford.edu/entries/sufficient-reason, [accessed on 01/06/2015].

Publicado

2016-06-30

Cómo citar

Ducheyne, S. (2016). Petrus Van Musschenbroek (1692-1761) en el ámbito de la physica y su lugar en la filosofía. Asclepio, 68(1), p123. https://doi.org/10.3989/asclepio.2016.02

Número

Sección

Estudios