La antorcha de Cupido: eugenesia, biotipología y eugamia en Argentina, 1930-1970
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/asclepio.2003.v55.i2.111Keywords:
eugenics, biotipology, eugamia, ArgentineAbstract
The goal of this work is to prove —through the legal analyse of matrimonial institution— the coercitivity that characterized to Argentine Eugenics and its reformulation «from the left to the right» from 1930, with the appointment of its more influential intellectuals to Biotipology. This «science» was systematized by the fascist Italian physician, Nicola Pende, and it was adopted, too, in the «Spain of Franco» by the military psychiatrist, Antonio Vallejo Nágera. That coercitivity was instrumented for legitimate classification, hierarchization and exclusion politics but it’s ignored, yet, by local historiography. It says that the catholic influence had a moderating function of «authoritarian » or «Anglo-Saxon» Eugenics. We’ll see, on the contrary, that the «Latin Eugenics» didn’t represent a soft modality of the politics of «betterment of race» orchestrated at the beginning of the XX century in the United States of America and in Germany, but it was the theoretical reason of a similar pseudoscientific delirium headed by Mussolini and quickly accepted in a country of South America.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2003-12-30
How to Cite
Miranda, M. A. (2003). La antorcha de Cupido: eugenesia, biotipología y eugamia en Argentina, 1930-1970. Asclepio, 55(2), 231–256. https://doi.org/10.3989/asclepio.2003.v55.i2.111
Issue
Section
Studies
License
Copyright (c) 2003 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.