La recepción del Lysenkismo en México
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/asclepio.2003.v55.i1.96Keywords:
Lysenko, Mexico, 20th century, biologyAbstract
The history of Biology in Mexico shows us several cases, where the discussion on the need to choose the applied science at the expense of pure science, and where the relationships between science and ideology and science and power were analyzed. Today, these cases allow us to research, how these problems were solved in the past. In this paper we study the conceptions and controversies between two prominent Mexican scientists, Alfonso L. Herrera e Isaac Ochoterena (who played an important role during the first stages of Biology in Mexico), reviewing the vastness’ hypothesis previously used to study this topic. We focus to analyze the acceptance of Lysenkoism, which occurred during the first half of the 20th Century, with the purposes to study the problems, the arguments, the individuals involved and, above all, the effects of this reception on the development of biological research in Mexico, which repercussion went on almost until the end of the 60s at the National Autonomous University of Mexico.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2003 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b67b2/b67b296c4d3b028c918eaf7bf864d9ab589a7b44" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.